Comment On Our Blog!
This is great information, very helpful. Thanks!!
I like the new site!
Great Site. Very user friendly.
http://www.utahmix.com
I wish your site had a place to review vendors. Flowers by Megan did not refund any of our prepaid flowers for the wedding and reception even though Megan had 5 weeks notice. Not a penny refunded. In fact, she will not respond to our calls and emails. This has been going on for 7 months with no success on getting this issue resolved.
Thank you for the heads up on Flowers by Megan. Often times bad things happen and there is no way to know who to use except by experience.
Wedding Engagement Rings for the Groom?
Wedding Engagement Rings for the Groom? - If you like him, put a ring on him!
Say "engagement ring" and you probably picture a little velvet box that the harried groom-to-be, or groom-to-be-rejected, is fumbling around with in his pocket. At that right moment, he will stop, drop and propose.
The often diamond-crusted band will be given to the future bride, representing a quasi-contractual commitment to stand on high heels in a receiving line at a bedazzled stake center gym for four hours.
In return, sometimes she receives another ring, perhaps to be soldered together.
But what about the groom? It's becoming increasingly popular for ladies to want their beaus to visibly take themselves off the market as well via a new trend that bears the charming portmanteau "man-gagemet rings."
According to a survey on brides.com, 45 percent of women are interested in buying their fiancees engagement bands.
Some suspect this is an offshoot of our modern era in which it's increasingly common for the girl to take matters into her own hands and pop the question; others think it's merely a marketing ploy.
Jewelers could certainly make a pretty penny off the trend -- though few brothers are going to be strutting around, showing off the brand new bling during Elders Quorum.
Most are simple, diamond-less band designs, manly engravings a la the One Ring.
A mass-market jewelry chain in the United Kingdom is even trying to draw new etiquette lines, asserting the man-gagement ring is to be worn on the ring finger of the left hand until the wedding, after which it is transferred to the same finger on the right hand, with the wedding band, of course, worn on the left.
This seems excessive, but it signifies the fascinating dichotomy between men and women, and wedding rings in general. While most women wear their rings without fail, post-nuptials, many men opt to go band-less after marriage.
An aversion from jewelry to history: Wedding rings for men didn't come into popularity until after World War II.
Although today it's customary in both religious and secular wedding ceremonies for the couple to exchange rings, the husband will likely leave his on the dresser or watch, horrified, as it bounces down the drain, never to be replaced.
While some may think that's no big deal, husbands should remember that not wearing a ring, especially if you're still college-aged, sends out the message, "I'm available."
Brenton Pendleton, 22, who's been married to his wife Jackie for just over a year, said that when he wears his ring it helps him "stay on the right path" by keeping her in his thoughts.
When he doesn't wear his ring, "she asks 'who are you trying to impress?'" he said. "Of course she's kidding... but I think it's still important for couples to wear their rings. It lets people know you're taken."
President David O. McKay once said, "That high view of marriage in the mind of that young bridegroom, and the appreciation of the sacredness of marriage by the bride, I think is one of the sublimest things in all the world."
Take a high view of marriage and realize wearing your wedding ring is symbolic of your eternal commitment. It's a good thing. Don't treat it lightly.
Avoid awkward situations where you have to tell an overly friendly girl in class or at work you're married. Your wife is likely wearing her ring with confidence and contentment -- and you should too, be it one ring... or two.
By Emily Schmuhl
http://www.mormontimes.com/mormon_voices/mormon_experience/?id=13513&
Mormon Times
Thursday, Feb. 25, 2010
E-mail: eschmuhl@desnews.com
MormonTimes.com is produced by the Deseret News in Salt Lake City, Utah.
It is not an official publication of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Copyright © 2009 Deseret News Publishing Company
How to Choose a Wedding Diamond
Expert ice advice - A go-to diamond guide for those approaching this summer’s wedding season without a clue.
Cost
A ring is meant to be a reminder, a symbol of eternal commitment. But for some brides-to-be, a ring is also either a status symbol ("Look how loaded my guy is") or a measurement of his love ("Look how much he loves me").
Before taking that terrifying trip to the jeweler, first determine your budget and stick to it. You chose her for eternity, but that doesn't mean you have to spend that much time paying for it. There's nothing romantic about steeping yourself into deep debt.
Second, prioritize your five Cs: color, cut, clarity, carat weight and cost. What element is more important to you?
How much should you spend?
The rule about spending two months' salary isn't set in stone, even if roughly 60 percent of U.S. men and women say it's "appropriate." The fact is, the world's leading diamond company, DeBeers, came up with the notion as a 1940's marketing campaign. By that rule, if you earn $30,000 a year, your net pay dictates you should drop about $3,750; for $40,000 it's $5,000 a ring; for $50,000 it's a $6,200 piece of ice. The rule may be over the top, but skimping on an item your wife will wear for the rest of her life is not a good start, either. It will always be in front of her eyes, at arm's length, an extension of her physical self.
A peer-reviewed Rutgers University study says the mean U.S. engagement ring is $3,867.55 -- 11 percent of a man's average salary. (That number, however, is likely to be lower for Mormons who marry younger than their counterparts; about 40 percent of couples in the study were 30 or older.) Women participate in choosing the ring 43 percent of the time, which increased the average cost of a ring by $133.
What you'll -- generally -- pay:
- $200 to $550 for a quarter carat or less, in a 10k gold setting -- the minimum karat that can still be considered gold.
- $550 to $800 for a .25 to .33 carat in an 18 karat gold setting
- $800 to $1,000 for diamonds between .33 and .5 carats
- $1,000 to $2,000 for higher quality stones between .33 and .60 carats, or mid-quality stones up to .75 carats
- $2,000 to $3,500 for high quality (VVS2 or VS1) half-carats, or good (SI1 or SI2) one-carat stones
- $3,500 to $6,000 for quality one-carat stones set 18-plus-karat gold
- $6,000 to $9,000 for very high quality one-carat stones (VVS1)
Cut/Shape
An old adage says, "It's the thought that counts." But when it comes to engagements rings, perhaps "It's the cut that counts." And according to Tiffany & Co., "Cut refers to the facet proportions on the surface of a diamond. More than any other factor, the precision of these facets determines the beauty of the stone."
Brilliant/Round: It's classic. It's the most popular. It's 58 facets make it the most brilliant of cuts, according to calculations of mathematician Marcel Tolkowsky in 1919.
Princess: It's the second most popular -- after the round -- and less expensive than the round because it's easier to create. This relatively newer square shape can have anywhere from 49 to 144 facets. Extra sides increase sparkle factor and make flaws less noticeable.
Asscher: This square version reached its height of popularity in the 1930s, but with the return of fashion's fondness for vintage and antique, its back.
Emerald: rectangular with cropped corners. It's large table is the best for showcasing a diamond's clarity.
Heart: For those who find sleeves a cumbersome place to keep their heart. It's pear shaped with a top cleft and considered the most romantic.
Marquise: A clever cut with a few tricks. The pointed oval makes a diamond appear larger and makes fingers appear longer and leaner.
Oval: The elongated, round shape gives it noteworthy brilliance. And, like the marquise, it can flatter shorter fingers.
Radiant: This rectangular stone with trimmed corners has a leg up on the emerald cut, with 70 facets on its underside to maximize light refraction.
Carat
Selecting the perfect size a game of trade-offs. Size is largely dependent on your budget and how persnickety you are -- or she is -- about clarity, cut and color. The less fussy you are the larger diamond you can afford. Lately, the national average engagement diamond is around 0.38 carats, up from the 1970s when it was about .25 carats, according to James Greene, master gemologist appraiser.
A one-carat diamond usually runs between $3,000 and $9,000, depending on its brilliance. Because you're not likely Saudi Arabian royalty you probably can't afford both the largest and most brilliant rock, so you must ask what is more important. Size over brilliance? Brilliance over size? Or an upper-end combination of all the criteria: a half-carat, round cut, VVS2, E colored "good cut" for about $1,800?
So you don't get duped:
Buy your stone loose. A set diamond will reflect the color of the prongs and flaws can be hidden under a claw. (One deceptive practice involves putting a tiny bit of blue or purple paint on the lowest tip of the diamond. This spreads the color throughout the stone and counters yellow tints in lower color grades.)
- Always ask to see your diamond under at least a 10x gem microscope for a true view of a diamond's clarity.
- Never buy from a store that grades their own diamonds. Grading your own stones is the equivalent of writing your own report card.
- Ask for the diamond's exact weight. The FTC allows jewelers to round off weights so a diamond listed as 3
- 4 carat might actually weigh between .69 and .81 carat.
- Look for a diamond with proper certification such as GIA or AGS, which will not certify fracture-filled diamonds.
- Work with a direct diamond importer. Middlemen can be expensive.
- Be comfortable with the place you buy your ring. Your fiancee will likely return for repairs, cleanings and sizings.
- Appraisals, often inflated by 100 percent, are for insurance only and shouldn't be a sales tool.
- Don't be pressured into buying quick. Diamonds are millions of years old; an extra week or two won't hurt.
Clarity
No diamond is totally perfect, and almost all diamonds have some sort of "birth mark."
The smaller and fewer the flaws, inclusions that can be observed under 10x magnification, the more perfect the diamond.
The Gemological Institute of America developed an 11-grade clarity scale to rank diamond clarity, ranging from FL (flawless) where a skilled grader can't observe any blemishes or inclusions, to I1, I2 and I3 where inclusions are obvious and may affect transparency.
Most diamonds fall under the VS (very slightly included) or SI (slightly included) categories, and flawless diamonds are so rare, most jewelers have never seen one. So, ladies, it's probably in your best interest not to mention such a thing as a flawless diamond to your sweetheart, or he may feel obligated to go to the ends of earth -- and your soon-to-be-shared bank account -- to get one.
Source: Gemological institute of America
Color
Who says too much of something is always a bad thing? In diamonds, light coloring can detract from the worth of the gem. Lighter tones of yellow and brown are discouraged as most jewel diamonds are nearly colorless. However, highly-colored diamonds, in yellow or blue, can be prized for their interesting hues.
Colors D, E and F are colorless; G, H, I and J are nearly colorless; K, L and M are faint yellow; N though Z are light yellow. And darker pink and yellow hues are considered rare and precious.
By Emily Schmuhl
http://www.mormontimes.com/mormon_voices/mormon_experience/?id=13513&
Mormon Times
Thursday, Feb. 25, 2010
E-mail: eschmuhl@desnews.com
MormonTimes.com is produced by the Deseret News in Salt Lake City, Utah.
It is not an official publication of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Copyright © 2009 Deseret News Publishing Company
FREE Online Relationship Questionnaire
RELATE is an online relationship questionnaire designed to provide you with research-based feedback about how you are doing in your relationship. It is the only existing questionnaire with feedback that has been scientifically proven to help couples improve their relationships. Each partner completes the questionnaire individually and within minutes after completion, a detailed assessment report is generated. The report includes graphs and text to help couples discuss the most important issues in their relationship. It also helps partners recognize strengths in their relationship, discover resources, identify potential problems, and open a dialogue about their values, attitudes and beliefs about marriage itself. RELATE usually costs $10/person, but you can participate FREE by clicking HERE! (You must link from utahmarriage.org to access this resource free)
Tips for Curly Hair Brides
Tips for Curly Hair Brides!
Thanks Rachel Hoang - Aura Hair and Body Salon
Get Married on the Moon
Salt Lake couple weds on moon, or closest thing to it
SALT LAKE CITY — Vanessa Hyde called her future mother-in-law last Friday and told her the big news: "Jake and I are getting married on the moon." Talk about your destination weddings.
Jake Dauwalder and Vanessa are on a tight budget, though, and the moon is more than 238,000 miles away, so the couple chose the nearest facsimile: the moonscape exhibit at the Clark Planetarium.
On Monday, the couple stood on the moon's gray, barren Taurus-Littrow Valley, where the astronauts of Apollo 17 landed in December 1972, and became man and wife.
The rest of the wedding party stood on Mars, a similar exhibit a few feet away.
It's the Clark Planetarium's first moon wedding, although several couples have married under the faux starry night sky of the planetarium's Hansen Dome.
The wedding destination was the idea of the bride, 21. "She wanted it to be unique," explained the groom, 24, who is a catering coordinator for Einstein Bros. Bagels. Getting married, he said, "is a once-in-a-lifetime event."
The wedding location and date were decided upon last Friday; Vanessa bought her dress on Saturday; the planetarium was contacted Monday morning. There was no time to arrange any music, so Vanessa instructed the wedding party to hum "dum, dum, da, dum."
"We've all heard of a person wanting to give his loved one the moon," noted the wedding officiator, LDS Bishop Kevin Jardine.
Following the short ceremony, the wedding party traveled to The Pie, where a pizza was topped with a king and princess.
According to the bride's mother, Miriam Hyde, the couple can't afford a honeymoon. Just the moon.
Wedding Spending is Down
The average cost of a wedding in 2009 drops 10.2% over 2008
2009 Wedding Industry spending Numbers
The wedding cost numbers for 2009 are in and they look close to expected. Couples spent $19,581 in 2009 compared to $21,814 in 2008, a 10.2% decline. The average number of guests in 2009 was 128, a decline of 11.7% from 145 in 2008.
Jewelry, gifts, and invitations lead the way for spending decline as couples spent 50.8% less on anklets, 44.1% less on gifts for their parents, and 36.4% less on reception menus.
Musicians, Soloist, or Ensemble, Photographer, and wedding dress top the list of spending increases as couples spent 23.3% more on Musicians, Soloist, or Ensemble, 16% more on a wedding photographer, and 12.6% more on the wedding dress.
2009 Methodology
Survey samples include brides, grooms (pre and post wedding) and wedding vendors. Samples from brides and grooms include multiple ethnicities, income levels, first, second, and third plus marriages, ages 18 to 90, across the entire US in large and small cities. Couples either married in 2009 or spent money for a product or service in 2009 for their 2010 wedding. Total sample size was 3,100 surveys, conducted in 2009. Margin of error: 1.76%. Total wedding cost based on weighted average demand of items included in the wedding.
Info provided by: http://www.TheWeddingReport.com
What are you spending??
Photography and Videography Styles Brides Want
2010 Photography and Videography Styles Brides Want Most
Do you agree with this?
Recent results from a photography and videography survey show that 2010 brides and grooms most (57%) interested in black and white shots and least (2%) interested in trashing the dress.
Here is a list of photography and videography styles tracked in the survey from most interested to least interested. 
| Black and White Shots |
| Pre-Wedding Shoot |
| Reception Prints |
| Candid Style |
| Unexpected Angle Shots |
| Engagement Session |
| Wedding Movie |
| Photojournalism, Documentary, or Indie Style |
| Wedding Outtakes |
| Contemporary Vintage |
| Cherish the Dress |
| Mixing Film and Photos |
| Fashion or Fine Art Photography Style |
| Rent a Photo Booth |
| High-Definition Recording |
| None of these |
| Editorial Style |
| Proposal Photography |
| Boudoir Session |
| Day-after Shoot |
| On Table Camcorders |
| Wedding Trailer |
| LIVE-Streaming |
| Trash The Dress |
Sample size was 475 brides and grooms from all over the US to be married in 2010. Margin of error, 4.5%.
Source - Shane McMurray - http://www.TheWeddingReport.com
Wedding Costs Unexpectedly Increase
Are you finding this to be the case?
According to The Wedding Report, the average cost of a wedding unexpectedly increases by 34% from $16,546 in Q2 2009 to $22,121 in Q3 2009. Increased demand and October being the busiest month in 2009 contributed to the increase. Results based on 750 survey samples of brides, grooms, and wedding vendors across the US. Average cost based on weighted average demand.
Top Spending Changes
| Q2 2009 | Q3 2009 | % Chg | |
| Reception Bar Service | $1,617 | $2,732 | 69% |
| Ordained Friend, Family Member | $113 | $189 | 67% |
| Reception Food Service | $2,786 | $4,326 | 55% |
| Live Band | $1,438 | $2,198 | 53% |
| Antique Car Rental | $576 | $875 | 52% |
Top Demand Changes
| Q2 2009 | Q3 2009 | % Chg | |
| Day-of-Coordinator | 6% | 24% | 294% |
| A La Carte Services | 4% | 14% | 239% |
| Watch for Bride | 4% | 14% | 218% |
| Live Band | 12% | 39% | 212% |
| Musician/s, Soloist, or Ensemble | 13% | 39% | 210% |
The Wedding Report, Inc.
Website: http://www.TheWeddingReport.com
Thieves are Targeting Wedding Photography Cameras
This is Terrible! Make sure your wedding photographer is aware of this so you don't loose all of your pictures.
Heidi Walker had an uneasy feeling something wasn't right. She had just finished photographing a wedding at Temple Square when she sensed she was being watched as she walked back to her car.
She drove off and stopped at a downtown business for 10 minutes to buy supplies. She left her camera equipment out of sight inside her car and locked her doors. Later that night, when she went to shoot the reception, she realized her camera, her laptop and all her equipment — totaling about $20,000 — was gone.
For the complete story go to: http://www.deseretnews.com/article/705340763/Thieves-are-targeting-cameras.html.